Binary Tree? I give...is that you with all the arrows pointing?
Tue 15-Jul-2003 12:45 Posted by:Nyn
Nyn, I believe they are not arrows but links to child nodes.... also bringing me to the conclusion he is misnamed and should in fact be called Ternary Tree
Best do as vlad says - if you infringe his copyright then, well, put it this way: have you ever seen "The importance of being Earnest"? Well that's the kind of martial arts he studies, and the first lesson's always free.
The man owns a BUSINESS for fuck's sake!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!
Fri 18-Jul-2003 20:49 Posted by:Anal Avenger
Sorry vlad, you're full of shit. Those photos are prior art. You had no copyright notice at the foot of the page, so you can go fuck yourself. Laws as we know them are not retroactive, stupid.
Fri 18-Jul-2003 21:25 Posted by:Vlad's full of shit
Wow, Turkish Delight, you looks so FIT and TONED! Do you study the Martial Artz by chance?
Fri 18-Jul-2003 21:40 Posted by:Living Incarnation of Pure Evil - [Link]
For the record, you don't have to place a copyright notice on an original work for the copyright to be in place. That's merely a formality. Also, "prior art" has nothing to do with copyright and everything to do with patents.
Vlad's a whiner. What do you expect? Actual lawsuits? If he can't even afford a dinner suit, how can he afford a lawyer?
Sat 19-Jul-2003 00:01 Posted by:The AV3 vlad@lrsehosting.com
Unless vlad took the photo himself (on a lsef timer) he doesn't own the copyright - the person who took the photo does, so you can sit pretty till the actual holder complains....
Sun 20-Jul-2003 12:15 Posted by:anonimouse
Stop picking on me! Don't make me and my eight dozen K5 nicks come to your house and use me l33t martial arts on you!!
Sun 20-Jul-2003 16:55 Posted by:Scott Lockwood vlad@lrsehosting.com
My father molests me.
Sun 20-Jul-2003 16:59 Posted by:Toncek Martincek Lockwood
anonimouse is wrong. you need a model release to publish a person's photo. (ianal)
on a related note, if somebody doesn't like any of these comments, you may find yourself presented with a nice libel suit. (ianal)
Mon 21-Jul-2003 18:16 Posted by:foobar
la princesa had a photo of her. It was a breast shot that was fotoshoped. Click on the link so you may see it (along with two others).
Mon 21-Jul-2003 18:39 Posted by:a little birdie - [Link]
I would just like to note that johnny has a blue FACE, so I think my hair is quite acceptable.
Luv, AE
Mon 21-Jul-2003 20:08 Posted by:AmberEyes
Model release not necessary, otherwise you wouldn't be able to take pictures anywhere. If someone consents to have their photo taken and doesn't impose any conditions at the time - tough!
Model releases are formalities so that she can't say she imposed any conditions when the photo was taken.
Hi Sir ,I am from Singapore,We are currently exporting heavy cars and vehicle to south Africa We like to expand our base further,would you like to market used cars and machinery for us in your country,kindly contact me via
email thank you
![http://www.aemaps.com/ambercam/ambercam.jpg">AmerberEyes</a>?](http://www.aemaps.com/ambercam/ambercam.jpg">AmerberEyes</a>?){kind=link}
